Small office networking scenario: Stephanie needs a simple yet secure setup where each user keeps full control over their own workstation data while still being able to share files with others in the office. With only basic networking knowledge among staff, which network model is the best fit?

Introduction / Context:
Small offices often need to balance simplicity, basic security, and low administrative overhead. When users want to retain direct control over their local data but also share folders or printers with coworkers, a peer-to-peer design aligns with these goals without demanding advanced server administration skills.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• User group has only basic networking knowledge.
• Goal is “simple but secure,” not enterprise-grade directory services.
• Users want control over their own data and selective sharing.
• Cost and complexity should be minimal.

Concept / Approach:
In a peer-to-peer network, each workstation can publish shared resources and set permissions locally. This matches environments where centralized authentication, roaming profiles, and group policies are not mandatory. Basic OS-native sharing (with passwords or user accounts) and a modest firewall/antivirus posture can deliver acceptable security for a very small office.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
If future needs grow (centralized login, audit, compliance), the office can later migrate to a server-based or cloud directory model. For now, peer-to-peer keeps setup and maintenance straightforward.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Over-sharing folders with “everyone,” using weak passwords, and neglecting regular updates. Document share locations and teach users how to map drives safely.

Final Answer:
Peer-to-peer.