Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 100 to 200 L/m2/hr
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Slow sand filters (SSF) achieve excellent microbiological removal at very low filtration rates thanks to biological processes within the schmutzdecke (biologically active layer).
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Design guidance places SSF around 0.1–0.2 m/h, which equals 100–200 L/m2/hr. This supports biologically mediated removal while maintaining effluent quality.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Recognize that SSF emphasize biological action; high rates would disrupt performance.2) Convert 0.1–0.2 m/h to L/m2/hr: 1 m/h = 1000 L/m2/hr; thus 0.1–0.2 m/h = 100–200 L/m2/hr.3) Choose the option matching this standard range.Verification / Alternative check:Historical SSF designs and WHO guidance cite similar ranges and operational practices.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
10–20: too low; impractically small throughput.1500–2500 or 4000–5000: far too high; these are rapid filtration/pressure filter regimes.600–900: still high for SSF; risks breakthrough.Common Pitfalls:Confusing SSF with RSF; forgetting unit conversions; assuming higher rate is always better.
Final Answer:100 to 200 L/m2/hr
Discussion & Comments