Folder structure and access — Is it good practice to have a single, shared directory where all employees store work, or should organizations use structured repositories with permissions, version control, and clear ownership?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
How files are organized directly affects collaboration efficiency and risk. A single, undifferentiated directory seems simple but quickly becomes a liability: lost versions, accidental overwrites, and inability to enforce access control. Modern practice favors structured repositories governed by documented rules.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Statement: it is a good idea to have a single directory for all employees to store work.
  • We assume multi-project, multi-role organizations with sensitive and evolving documents.
  • Goal: ensure findability, integrity, and compliance.


Concept / Approach:
Best practice uses role-based repositories (project, department, product line) with permission boundaries, naming standards, and version control. EDMS/PLM adds workflows, metadata, and release states. This structure reduces error rates and speeds onboarding, while a single dump folder undermines traceability and security.


Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify risks of a single directory: collisions, lack of ownership, poor searchability.2) Compare with structured repositories: clear hierarchy, permissions, and audit trails.3) Consider compliance: many standards require control beyond a shared folder.4) Conclude the “single directory” idea is poor practice.


Verification / Alternative check:
Incident reviews often trace errors to unmanaged file shares; migrating to controlled repositories typically reduces rework and improves audit outcomes.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Correct: Incorrect because the premise is unsafe and inefficient.
  • Small teams / daily backups / short projects: Size, backups, or timeline do not eliminate the need for structure and permissions.


Common Pitfalls:
Relying on file timestamps instead of version control; mixing drafts with released records; no clear naming schema; granting universal write access.


Final Answer:
Incorrect

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion