Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
How files are organized directly affects collaboration efficiency and risk. A single, undifferentiated directory seems simple but quickly becomes a liability: lost versions, accidental overwrites, and inability to enforce access control. Modern practice favors structured repositories governed by documented rules.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Best practice uses role-based repositories (project, department, product line) with permission boundaries, naming standards, and version control. EDMS/PLM adds workflows, metadata, and release states. This structure reduces error rates and speeds onboarding, while a single dump folder undermines traceability and security.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify risks of a single directory: collisions, lack of ownership, poor searchability.2) Compare with structured repositories: clear hierarchy, permissions, and audit trails.3) Consider compliance: many standards require control beyond a shared folder.4) Conclude the “single directory” idea is poor practice.
Verification / Alternative check:
Incident reviews often trace errors to unmanaged file shares; migrating to controlled repositories typically reduces rework and improves audit outcomes.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Relying on file timestamps instead of version control; mixing drafts with released records; no clear naming schema; granting universal write access.
Final Answer:
Incorrect
Discussion & Comments