The following four labelled sentences P, Q, R and S, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph about moral values and righteous behaviour. Select the most logical order.

Introduction / Context:
This para-jumble revolves around the idea of a righteous person and how moral values influence behaviour and inner peace. The sentences mention a definition of righteousness, how such a person acts, their emotional state, and how behaviour reflects morals and ethics. Your task is to arrange these in a sequence that reads as a clear and meaningful paragraph.

Given Data / Assumptions:
- S: A person who is righteous is one who has developed moral values and lives by them.
- Q: Such persons follow their moral values whatever difficulty they may have to encounter in the process.
- R: They do not fear punishment and stay in a state of peace and contentment.
- P: Our behavior and character speak of the morals and ethics that we live by.
- We want an order that starts with a definition, then describes actions, emotional state, and finally comments on behaviour and character in general.

Concept / Approach:
A sensible paragraph structure here is: define the righteous person, explain how such a person behaves, describe the inner results of that behaviour, and then summarise with a general statement about behaviour and morals. Sentence S clearly offers a definition of a righteous person, so it should come first. Q continues by describing how such persons follow moral values even when it is difficult. R then explains the emotional reward: they do not fear punishment and live in peace and contentment. P, which makes a broader statement about behaviour and character reflecting morals, works well as a concluding sentence. Hence, the best order is S–Q–R–P.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Choose the definition as the starting point. S defines a righteous person, so it naturally introduces the main subject.
Step 2: Q logically follows because “Such persons” explicitly refers back to the righteous individuals defined in S, describing what they do when faced with difficulties.
Step 3: R carries the idea forward by describing the internal state of those people: freedom from fear of punishment and a sense of peace and contentment.
Step 4: P generalises the theme, stating that our behaviour and character reflect our morals and ethics, which neatly wraps up the paragraph.

Verification / Alternative check:
Read SQRP as one paragraph: first a clear definition, then description of consistent behaviour, then inner peace, and finally a general observation. The flow from specific description of righteous people to a general statement about all people's behaviour is logical. Starting with P instead, as in PSQR, would introduce behaviour and character without focusing immediately on “a righteous person”, making the paragraph less focused on the main subject.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- QRPS and QSPR: These begin with Q (“Such persons…”) without introducing who “Such persons” are, which is confusing without S first.
- RPQS: Starts with R (“They do not fear punishment…”) where “They” has no clear reference, disrupting coherence.
- PSQR: P as an opening is possible, but then S, Q and R follow in a less tight, less focused order than S–Q–R–P.

Common Pitfalls:
Para-jumble questions often hide the correct order behind pronouns such as “they” and phrases like “such persons”. Always identify which sentence introduces the subject and which sentences depend on that introduction. In this case, noticing that “Such persons” refers back to “a person who is righteous” is the key to unlocking the correct sequence.

Final Answer:
The most logical order of the sentences is SQRP.