Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: A sense of the rich, varied, and abundant life that riparian areas support.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The passage describes riparian vegetation and explains how it helps stabilise banks, filter sediment, and provide habitat and winter cover for wildlife. At one point, the author mentions specific birds such as woodpeckers, nuthatches, and brown creepers that feed on insects in dead trees. The question asks what overall sense this list of birds conveys to the reader. This is a classic question about the effect of detail in descriptive and informative writing.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
When writers list several concrete examples, such as the names of different birds, they often aim to show variety, richness, or specificity. Here, the author is trying to help the reader visualise streamside habitats as lively, diverse ecosystems. The mention of multiple bird species suggests that many different forms of life depend on riparian vegetation. Therefore we must identify the option that captures this sense of richness and variety, rather than urgency, self importance, or pure poetry.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Look at the context of the list. The passage is explaining that dead trees are an integral part of streamside habitats because they provide food and habitat for birds and insects.
Step 2: Evaluate option A. It claims that the list communicates urgency about endangered species. The passage does not mention extinction or endangerment, so this is not supported.
Step 3: Evaluate option C. It suggests that the author wants to show personal importance as a scientific expert. The tone of the passage is informative and neutral, not self promoting.
Step 4: Evaluate option D. It says the passage evokes poetic wonder without scientific basis. This is incorrect because the passage is grounded in practical ecological information.
Step 5: Evaluate option E. It says only a few dull species can live there. In fact, the list hints at variety and ecological complexity, not dullness or limitation.
Step 6: Evaluate option B. It states that the list conveys a sense of rich and varied life in riparian areas. This matches the effect of naming several different bird species that depend on this habitat.
Verification / Alternative check:
We can test our answer by paraphrasing. The author could have written birds live here, but instead names several bird species, emphasizing variety. The logical inference is that riparian areas are full of diverse wildlife. Since no mention is made of extinction, personal fame, or empty poetic language, option B best fits the overall impression created by the list of birds.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A is wrong because the passage does not describe these species as endangered or near extinction.
Option C is wrong because the passage does not stress the author; it focuses on the ecosystem.
Option D is wrong because the descriptions are factual and grounded in ecological observations, not purely poetic.
Option E is wrong because giving several examples suggests diversity, not limitation to a few dull species.
Common Pitfalls:
Readers sometimes over interpret emotional content in a factual passage or assume that any mention of animals implies endangered status. It is important to look for direct markers of urgency, such as words like crisis or extinction. In this passage, the tone is descriptive and instructional, so a more moderate interpretation focused on diversity and richness is appropriate.
Final Answer:
The list of specific birds conveys a sense of the rich and varied life that riparian areas support.
Discussion & Comments