Rocket Propulsion – Law of Action and Reaction A teacher states that Newton’s third law of motion is directly involved when explaining how rockets move in space. Is this statement justified?
-
Ajustified
-
Bnot justified
-
Cjustified only near Earth’s surface
-
Djustified only with aerodynamic lift
-
Enot justified without gravity
Answer
Correct Answer: justified
Explanation
Introduction / Context: Rockets accelerate by expelling mass (exhaust gases) at high speed. Understanding which fundamental law explains this motion is central to basic mechanics and aerospace engineering.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Rocket ejects exhaust mass backward at high velocity.
- System is isolated over short intervals (neglecting external forces).
- Motion occurs even in vacuum (no need for air to “push against”).
Concept / Approach: Newton’s third law: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. The rocket exerts a force on the exhaust gases backward; the gases exert an equal and opposite force on the rocket forward. This interaction creates thrust and accelerates the rocket.
Step-by-Step Solution: Exhaust mass flow rate: ṁ. Relative exhaust speed: u (backward relative to rocket). Thrust magnitude: T ≈ ṁ * u (neglecting pressure terms for simplicity). Direction: forward on rocket, backward on exhaust—an action–reaction pair.
Verification / Alternative check: Conservation of momentum provides an equivalent explanation: as the rocket imparts backward momentum to exhaust, the rocket gains equal forward momentum. This is consistent with Newton’s third law.
Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Not justified” or “only near Earth’s surface”: incorrect because rockets operate using internal reaction forces, not relying on air or ground. “Only with aerodynamic lift” or “requires gravity”: thrust arises from mass ejection, independent of atmosphere or gravity.
Common Pitfalls: Thinking rockets push against air; in vacuum they still accelerate by ejecting mass.
Final Answer: justified