Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 1/4 W
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Choosing an appropriate resistor power rating is part of reliable circuit design. The rating must exceed the actual worst-case power dissipation so the part does not overheat, drift, or fail prematurely. A common rule is to select the next higher standard rating above the calculated dissipation, typically leaving a margin (for example, running at 50–70% of the rated wattage).
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:First determine the smallest standard rating that is greater than the worst-case dissipation. Then verify that the resulting operating point keeps the resistor comfortably below its limit. Designers often target no more than about 50–70% of the rated wattage in normal service to accommodate tolerances and temperature rise.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Compute or note P_diss ≈ 0.18 W.List the nearby standard ratings: 0.125 W (1/8 W), 0.25 W (1/4 W), 0.5 W (1/2 W).Select the next higher available rating above 0.18 W → 0.25 W (1/4 W).Check margin: 0.18 / 0.25 = 0.72 → about 72% of rating (acceptable for many low-cost builds; 1/2 W would give extra thermal headroom if the environment is hot).Verification / Alternative check:Use P = I^2 * R or P = V^2 / R to recompute the worst case and compare to the data sheet’s derating curves. If the resistor will be in a high-ambient enclosure, consider stepping up to 1/2 W for additional safety margin.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
1/2 W, 1 W, 2 W: These exceed the minimum required; while safer thermally, they are not the “at least” value needed by the question.1/8 W (not listed): would be below the dissipation and unsafe.Common Pitfalls:Choosing a rating equal to the calculated dissipation with no margin; forgetting that supply tolerance, component tolerance, and ambient temperature can increase real dissipation; ignoring enclosure derating curves.
Final Answer:1/4 W
Discussion & Comments