You are configuring remote access and must choose an authentication method. Which of the following options provides the highest level of security for Windows-based remote access connections?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Microsoft encrypted authentication version 2 (MS-CHAP v2)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Remote access security in Windows environments depends heavily on the authentication protocol used. Different protocols offer varying levels of protection against password cracking, replay attacks, and eavesdropping. This question compares several authentication methods commonly seen in Windows 2000 era remote access: MS-CHAP v2, MS-CHAP, CHAP, and SPAP. Your task is to identify which one provides the strongest security characteristics.


Given Data / Assumptions:

    You are configuring remote access connections in a Windows environment.
    The available authentication protocols include MS-CHAP v2, MS-CHAP, CHAP, and SPAP.
    Security is the primary concern when choosing the authentication method.
    You want protection against replay attacks, stronger password handling, and better mutual authentication if available.
    You must choose a single method that offers the highest level of security among the options listed.


Concept / Approach:
MS-CHAP v2 (Microsoft Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol version 2) is an improved version of MS-CHAP that provides mutual authentication, stronger encryption keys, and better protection against certain types of attacks. It is designed specifically for Windows environments and supports features like password change over the network. MS-CHAP (version 1) offers encryption and challenge-response but lacks some of the security improvements of MS-CHAP v2. CHAP is a non-Microsoft standard that provides challenge-response authentication but typically does not integrate as tightly with Windows security. SPAP is a proprietary protocol that provides only weak obfuscation and is considered the least secure of the group. Therefore, MS-CHAP v2 is regarded as the most secure option among these choices.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: List the protocols: MS-CHAP v2, MS-CHAP, CHAP, and SPAP. Step 2: Recall that MS-CHAP v2 introduces mutual authentication, meaning both client and server verify each other, reducing the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks. Step 3: Understand that MS-CHAP v2 also improves password hashing and key generation mechanisms relative to MS-CHAP. Step 4: Compare this to CHAP, which is more generic and does not provide the Windows-specific enhancements and integration offered by MS-CHAP v2. Step 5: Remember that SPAP is considered weak because it uses reversible encryption and does not offer the strong protections found in the other protocols. Step 6: Based on these characteristics, identify MS-CHAP v2 as the authentication method with the highest level of security among the four options.


Verification / Alternative check:
If you consult Microsoft remote access best practices, you will find that MS-CHAP v2 is recommended over MS-CHAP and CHAP due to mutual authentication and stronger encryption. In addition, SPAP is often discouraged except for legacy compatibility scenarios. This external guidance supports the conclusion that MS-CHAP v2 is the strongest of the listed protocols.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Microsoft encrypted authentication (MS-CHAP) – Provides challenge-response security but lacks some of the enhanced features of MS-CHAP v2, making it less secure overall.

Encrypted authentication (CHAP) – While more secure than plaintext methods, it does not offer the same level of integration and advanced protections that MS-CHAP v2 provides in a Windows environment.

Shiva Password Authentication Protocol (SPAP) – Uses weak encryption and is generally regarded as the least secure of the options, appropriate only for backward compatibility with certain legacy systems.


Common Pitfalls:
A typical mistake is assuming that any encrypted protocol is equally secure. In reality, the details of how passwords are hashed, how challenges are computed, and whether mutual authentication exists make a significant difference. Another pitfall is overvaluing generic protocols like CHAP when Microsoft platforms have enhanced versions tailored for tighter security, such as MS-CHAP v2.


Final Answer:
Among the listed options, Microsoft encrypted authentication version 2 (MS-CHAP v2) provides the highest level of security for Windows-based remote access connections.

More Questions from Microsoft Certification

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion