Rearrange the parts of the sentence (P, Q, R) to form a coherent sentence: There is a deeper P - fissure here that goes Q - from western theory R - beyond explanations.

Introduction / Context:
This English language question tests a very common competitive exam skill, namely the ability to rearrange jumbled parts of a sentence in order to form a single clear, grammatically correct, and logically meaningful statement. The given sentence has three labelled parts P, Q, and R, and the learner must decide the most natural order of these parts when they are placed after the introductory clause. Such questions check understanding of sentence structure, flow of ideas, connectors, and the usual position of phrases in standard written English. They are also a good way to test whether the candidate can quickly see how ideas relate to each other and recognise which fragment can logically follow another. The sentence talks about a deeper fissure, or division, that is related to western theory and something that goes beyond explanations, so the order of these ideas must sound natural and precise.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The fixed introductory part is: There is a deeper
• P: fissure here that goes
• Q: from western theory
• R: beyond explanations
• The aim is to form a single grammatically correct and meaningful sentence.

Concept / Approach:
To solve jumbled sentence questions, we look for grammatical links, logical flow, and the natural position of phrases. The phrase fissure here that goes describes something that continues or extends, so it must be followed by a phrase that tells us where or in what sense it goes. The expression goes beyond explanations is a very common and natural collocation in English. Finally, the phrase from western theory fits naturally at the end, because it tells us the source or framework from which these explanations come. Thus we identify which fragments combine into familiar expressions and where the remaining phrase fits best without breaking the flow.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Read the full sentence after arranging as PRQ and check if it is grammatically sound and logically coherent. The noun fissure is correctly followed by the relative clause here that goes beyond explanations, and the phrase from western theory logically modifies explanations. If we try any other arrangement, the sentence starts to sound awkward or incomplete. For example, PQR would give fissure here that goes from western theory beyond explanations, which is grammatically clumsy and stylistically weak. Therefore PRQ clearly gives the best and most idiomatic sentence structure among the options.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Option B (PQR) places from western theory immediately after goes, which is not natural because goes from western theory is not a standard phrase in this context.
• Option C (QPR) begins with from western theory after the introductory part, which breaks the expected flow after the word deeper and makes fissure appear too late.
• Option D (RPQ) puts beyond explanations immediately after deeper, which leaves fissure here that goes in a strange and disjointed position toward the end.

Common Pitfalls:
A common mistake in such questions is to follow the order in which the parts are printed instead of evaluating the logical flow. Another frequent error is to focus only on grammar and ignore collocations like goes beyond explanations that occur commonly in English. Some learners also tend to overthink the position of prepositional phrases such as from western theory, forgetting that such phrases often come at the end of a sentence. To avoid these pitfalls, always first look for familiar combinations of words, then see how the remaining parts fit together around these anchors.

Final Answer:
PRQ