In the following question, a statement is divided into segments. The first segment is fixed. Rearrange the remaining segments P, Q, R and S to form a coherent statement. Fixed segment: The dissolution of the assembly P: in the state which was Q: was followed by a prolonged R: already marred with political instability S: tug of war for seizing the power

Introduction / Context:
This rearrangement question requires you to form a coherent political news style sentence by putting jumbled segments in the correct order after a fixed beginning. The sentence talks about the dissolution of a legislative assembly, political instability and a struggle for power. You must choose the sequence that produces clear and natural English.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Fixed segment: "The dissolution of the assembly".
• P: "in the state which was".
• Q: "was followed by a prolonged".
• R: "already marred with political instability".
• S: "tug of war for seizing the power".
• We assume standard political reporting style.

Concept / Approach:
The sentence needs to mention where the assembly existed, describe the prior condition of that place, and then describe what happened after the dissolution. First, we attach a prepositional phrase "in the state which was" directly to "The dissolution of the assembly". Then we qualify that state with "already marred with political instability". After that, we state what the dissolution led to: "was followed by a prolonged tug of war for seizing the power". This suggests the order P R Q S.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Add P after the fixed segment: "The dissolution of the assembly in the state which was". This clearly identifies the location of the assembly.Step 2: Immediately qualify "the state" with R, "already marred with political instability". This gives "The dissolution of the assembly in the state which was already marred with political instability".Step 3: After describing the background condition, we need a main verb phrase explaining what happened next. Q, "was followed by a prolonged", correctly continues the sentence: "was followed by a prolonged".Step 4: Finally, we need an object for "was followed by". S, "tug of war for seizing the power", completes the idea: "was followed by a prolonged tug of war for seizing the power".Step 5: Combining them all, we get the full sentence: "The dissolution of the assembly in the state which was already marred with political instability was followed by a prolonged tug of war for seizing the power." This corresponds to the order P R Q S.

Verification / Alternative check:
Test other suggested orders quickly. RSPQ would give "The dissolution of the assembly already marred with political instability tug of war for seizing the power was followed by a prolonged", which is ungrammatical. QSRP would place "was followed by" immediately after the fixed segment without specifying the state, and also misorders the description. PSRQ and other combinations similarly break the logical flow or produce incorrect grammar. Only PRQS yields a fluent and meaningful sentence.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Options that start with Q after the fixed segment omit necessary information about location and background before describing the consequence. Options that place S too early create awkward fragments like "tug of war for seizing the power in the state which was", where the main verb is missing or delayed unnaturally.

Common Pitfalls:
Students sometimes fixate on the dramatic phrase "tug of war for seizing the power" and try to place it too early. A more reliable strategy is to start by ensuring that the subject, its qualifiers and the main verb are in the right order. Once that structure is clear, remaining descriptive phrases fall into place more easily.

Final Answer:
The correct order of the segments is P R Q S, so option D is correct.