Read the passage carefully and then answer the question that follows. The rich flora and fauna of Cubbon Park in Bengaluru often capture the attention of visitors more than anything else. However, when people pause and take time to look closely at the statue standing in the park, they begin to marvel at its sheer grandeur. Sculpted by Sir Thomas Brock, the marble statue, which is about 11 feet high, appears larger than life. It vividly brings out the personality of Queen Victoria, who was the Monarch of Great Britain from 1837 till 1901, depicting a rather proud, stern person with sharply defined and pronounced facial features. In 1906, the statue was formally unveiled in the city by George Frederick Ernest Albert, then Prince of Wales and Duke of Cornwall and York, and since that ceremony it has stood in all its glory, now well over 111 years old. Even though there is a wealth of history associated with the statue and it was deliberately made to appear imposing, many busy Bengalureans probably refer to it casually as just another familiar landmark. While workers in the park continue their discussions and carry out the instructions given to them, everyday life in Cubbon Park goes on as usual. Which of the following statements about the Queen Victoria statue in Bengaluru is false according to the passage?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: It is standing in Queen Victoria park.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This question asks the reader to identify which statement is false based on the passage about the Queen Victoria statue. All the options look similar to details mentioned in the text, so it is necessary to read carefully and distinguish between what is actually written and what has been altered. Such questions train precision and attention to subtle differences in wording.


Given Data / Assumptions:
The passage provides several clear facts about the statue.


    It says the statue is a marble statue.
    It describes the statue as about 11 feet high.
    It mentions that it has stood in all its glory for more than 111 years.
    It clearly locates the statue in Cubbon Park in Bengaluru.
    There is no mention of a place called Queen Victoria park in this context.


Concept / Approach:
The method here is to compare each option with the passage word by word. If a statement repeats the information accurately or in an equivalent way, it is true according to the passage. If a statement changes a crucial detail like the material, height, age, or location, then it becomes false. The key difference in these options lies in the location mentioned in one of the statements.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Step 1: Check Option A, which states that the statue is made of marble. The passage describes it as the marble statue, so this statement is true. Step 2: Check Option B, which says the statue is 11 feet tall. The passage says it is about 11 feet high, so this is also true. Step 3: Check Option C, which notes that it is described as being about 111 years old. The passage says it has stood for well over 111 years, so this is essentially accurate. Step 4: Check Option D, which claims that the statue is standing in Queen Victoria park. The passage clearly locates it in Cubbon Park, not in any place called Queen Victoria park, so this statement is false. Step 5: Check Option E, which correctly states that the statue stands in Cubbon Park in Bengaluru, matching the text.


Verification / Alternative check:
To verify, we can underline the location phrase in the passage. Early in the passage it states that the flora and fauna of Cubbon Park capture attention and later refers to the statue in that same park. There is no reference to any separate park named after Queen Victoria. Therefore, any option that relocates the statue to Queen Victoria park is incorrect. The other details about the statue material, height, and age are consistent with the original text.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Here, wrong means they are wrong as choices for the false statement, because they are actually true statements. Option A repeats the description of the statue as a marble statue. Option B matches the height given in the passage. Option C reflects the idea that the statue has stood for about 111 years or more. Option E correctly repeats that the statue is in Cubbon Park in Bengaluru. Only Option D introduces a new and incorrect location, Queen Victoria park, which the passage does not mention.


Common Pitfalls:
A typical mistake in such questions is to skim the options and select one that looks different without cross checking each word against the passage. Another error is to assume that because the statue honours Queen Victoria, it must automatically stand in a park named after her. This shows why it is essential to rely on the exact wording of the text instead of general assumptions or real world guesses. Careful reading helps avoid these traps.


Final Answer:
The false statement is It is standing in Queen Victoria park, because the passage clearly locates the statue in Cubbon Park in Bengaluru.

More Questions from English

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion