In financial statement analysis for a construction firm, ratio analysis is routinely used by multiple stakeholders. Who commonly relies on ratio analysis to evaluate performance, risk, and trends?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: All of these.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Ratio analysis converts raw financial statement data into comparable indicators of liquidity, profitability, efficiency, and leverage. In construction firms—where cash flows are uneven and projects are long-cycle—ratios help a wide set of stakeholders understand risk and performance beyond headline revenue figures.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • A construction company publishes audited financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, cash flows).
  • Stakeholders include owners, management, lenders, and analysts.
  • Common ratio families: liquidity, leverage, activity (turnover), and profitability.


Concept / Approach:
Each stakeholder views ratios through a different lens. Management monitors trends to steer operations and working capital. Shareholders assess returns and risk. Banks examine coverage and liquidity to judge creditworthiness. External analysts benchmark the firm against peers to form an independent view. Because construction is contract-based with retention and milestone billing, liquidity and cash conversion ratios are especially important.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify stakeholder objectives (e.g., lenders focus on interest coverage and current ratio; investors focus on ROE, ROCE, margins).Select relevant ratios from the four families to match those objectives.Interpret trends versus prior periods and benchmarks to reach conclusions.


Verification / Alternative check:

Cross-validate findings using common-size statements and cash flow analysis to ensure ratios reflect economic reality, not timing artifacts.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Any single group is only part of the audience; in practice all the listed stakeholders rely on ratio analysis.


Common Pitfalls:

Reading ratios in isolation without trends or peer comparison; ignoring contract-specific cash flow timing in construction.


Final Answer:

All of these.

More Questions from Engineering Economy

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion