Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: To detect problems in protocols
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
When a network misbehaves, engineers often “sniff” frames on the wire. A data link content monitor—often a protocol analyzer focused on Layer 2—captures, decodes, and displays frame contents and timing so that protocol behavior can be verified against specifications. This helps pinpoint errors such as malformed frames, incorrect checksums, duplex mismatches, or misconfigured VLAN tags.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Protocol analyzers reveal whether devices adhere to standards and whether sequence, timing, or field values are correct. By inspecting actual traffic, engineers can confirm or refute suspected causes. While a monitor can also infer link characteristics, its central value lies in detecting and diagnosing protocol issues through content analysis and validation of behavior.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Tools like Wireshark and dedicated taps are industry staples. They highlight bad FCS, malformed LLDP, or STP loops and confirm the diagnosis by showing concrete frame evidence—exactly what a data link content monitor is meant to accomplish.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing physical-layer testers (which check signal quality) with protocol analyzers; assuming traffic counters alone can diagnose protocol violations without looking into frame fields.
Final Answer:
To detect problems in protocols
Discussion & Comments