In classic IEEE 802.3 (Ethernet) design fundamentals, which capability is NOT provided by the basic MAC/framing system (assume no higher-layer recovery or 802.1Q enhancements)?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Automatic retransmission of a corrupted or lost frame by the link itself

Explanation:


Introduction:
Ethernet's original IEEE 802.3 design focused on a simple, fast link-layer method for sending frames on a shared medium. Understanding exactly what classic Ethernet does—and does not—do helps separate link-layer responsibilities from those of upper layers like TCP/IP. This question asks which specific capability is not supplied by basic Ethernet (without VLAN extensions or higher-layer recovery).


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Context is legacy/basic IEEE 802.3 operation (no 802.1Q VLANs, no link-layer ARQ).
  • Half-duplex shared media historically used CSMA/CD; full-duplex switching removed collisions but kept framing rules.
  • Upper layers (e.g., TCP) may provide reliability independent of Ethernet.


Concept / Approach:
At Layer 2, Ethernet offers addressing (MAC), framing, and an integrity check (FCS). Historical shared-media networks used CSMA/CD for media access control. If a frame is corrupted or lost, Ethernet does not automatically retransmit it by itself; the receiver simply discards a bad frame (FCS failure). Reliable delivery—automatic retransmission, ordering, flow/congestion control—belongs to higher layers (e.g., TCP) or to special link types that implement ARQ (not standard Ethernet).


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify normal Ethernet features: MAC addressing, framing, FCS.Recall media access on classic shared Ethernet: CSMA/CD.Check reliability: no built-in ARQ or link-layer retransmission in basic 802.3.Conclude the missing feature is automatic retransmission at the link itself.


Verification / Alternative check:
Packet captures show that receivers drop frames with bad FCS; no Ethernet "NACK" exists in standard 802.3. Recovery—if any—arises from upper-layer protocols (e.g., TCP sequence/ACK).


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • CSMA/CD is the classic Ethernet access method for half-duplex media.
  • MAC addressing is core to Ethernet frame delivery.
  • FCS/CRC is explicitly defined for frame integrity checking.
  • None of the above is incorrect because one option is indeed not provided.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming link-layer reliability exists because Wi-Fi uses ARQ; conflating switched full-duplex (no collisions) with guaranteed delivery; confusing VLANs (802.1Q) with basic 802.3.


Final Answer:
Automatic retransmission of a corrupted or lost frame by the link itself.

More Questions from Networking

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion