Choosing a safe resistor rating: For a carbon-composition resistor expected to dissipate up to 1.2 W continuously, which nominal power rating should be selected?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 2 W

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Proper power derating is critical for reliability. Resistors should be chosen with a power rating above the expected dissipation to handle tolerances, ambient temperature, and intermittent surges without overheating.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Maximum expected dissipation ≈ 1.2 W.
  • Standard resistor power ratings are considered (e.g., 0.5 W, 1 W, 2 W, 5 W).
  • Continuous operation and typical ambient conditions.


Concept / Approach:
Select the next higher standard rating above the calculated worst-case power. This provides margin for tolerance, temperature rise, and component aging. A common practice is to operate resistors at 50–60% of their rated power for longevity.


Step-by-Step Reasoning:

Computed need: 1.2 W continuous.Closest higher standard rating: 2 W (1 W is below requirement; 0.5 W far below).Therefore select a 2 W resistor; 5 W would be over-conservative and larger/costlier.


Verification / Alternative check:
Applying a derating guideline (e.g., use ≤ 60% of rating): 1.2 W / 0.6 = 2.0 W minimum rating. This corroborates the 2 W choice.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • 1 W and 0.5 W: Below the required dissipation, likely to overheat.
  • 5 W: Electrically safe but unnecessarily large and costly for a 1.2 W need.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Selecting a rating equal to calculated power with no margin.
  • Ignoring ambient temperature and ventilation, which further justify using a higher rating.


Final Answer:
2 W

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion