Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Wand
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Retail and POS environments use optical readers to capture product information quickly at checkout. Early and inexpensive devices were “wand” scanners—pen-like readers that you sweep across printed barcodes or specially formatted OCR characters. Recognizing the customary terminology helps distinguish among optical input devices used with terminals and kiosks.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
A wand scanner contains a light source and sensor; as it moves across a barcode or OCR line, it measures reflectance changes to reconstruct bars/spaces or character strokes. The terminal decodes the signal into digits or alphanumeric codes. By contrast, a light pen historically interacted with CRT screens by detecting the raster’s electron beam; a “cursor” is an on-screen pointer, not a hardware scanner; and modern “barcode imagers” are camera-based but not typically referred to as “OCR reading units” in legacy POS wording.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
POS equipment catalogs historically list “wand readers” for barcodes/OCR fonts (e.g., OCR-A/OCR-B on labels). Though modern 2D imagers are common today, the traditional name for the simple optical stick reader remains “wand.”
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming any optical input device at POS is a “light pen”; ignoring that the typical handheld legacy reader for printed codes is specifically called a “wand.”
Final Answer:
Wand
Discussion & Comments