Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: have suggested
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question is part of the same argumentative passage and tests verb agreement and tense choice in a relative clause. The clause refers to what some judicial pronouncements have done over a period of time. The author is discussing an ongoing public legal debate, not a single isolated event. Therefore, the choice of tense must reflect repeated or continuing suggestions made by various court rulings rather than one fixed moment in the past.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- The subject of the clause is some judicial pronouncements, which is plural.
- The main clause is in a present oriented question form: Is it for the integrity of the nation that uniformity in laws is required.
- The options are have suggested, had been suggesting, suggests, and suggested.
- The passage describes a long running discussion that is still relevant.
Concept / Approach:
First, we must ensure subject verb agreement. The phrase some judicial pronouncements is plural, so any correct verb in present tense must also be plural, for example, suggest, not suggests. Second, we must choose a tense that connects past judicial behaviour to the current debate. Present perfect have suggested is ideal for this, because it expresses that in various rulings up to now, courts have suggested something. Simple past suggested would be possible but would sound more like a completed action not strongly connected with the present ongoing debate. Past perfect continuous had been suggesting would require a specific later past reference, which is absent.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Check option A: have suggested. This agrees with the plural subject and uses present perfect, showing continued relevance.
Step 2: Check option B: had been suggesting. This form implies that the suggestions stopped before another past event, which the sentence does not mention.
Step 3: Check option C: suggests. This is singular and does not agree with the plural subject some judicial pronouncements.
Step 4: Check option D: suggested. While grammatically possible, it does not highlight the ongoing nature of the debate as clearly as the present perfect does.
Step 5: Consider the whole passage tone, which treats the debate as continuing to this day.
Step 6: Conclude that have suggested best fits the grammar and meaning.
Verification / Alternative check:
We can paraphrase the sentence: Is uniformity in laws required for the integrity of the nation, as some judicial pronouncements have suggested over the years. This wording sounds natural and clearly connects past court statements with the current question. If we use suggested without have, the connection with the present becomes slightly weaker. If we use suggests, the verb does not agree with the plural subject. Thus, present perfect plural have suggested is the most accurate and idiomatic choice for this context.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B, had been suggesting, is wrong because it implies that the process of suggesting had stopped at some point in the past, which the passage does not indicate.
Option C, suggests, is wrong because it is singular and cannot agree with the plural subject some judicial pronouncements.
Option D, suggested, is less suitable because it treats the judicial suggestions as a finished past event, while the author is clearly presenting them as part of an ongoing argument.
Common Pitfalls:
Some students pick the past perfect or past perfect continuous form whenever they see a complex literary passage, assuming that a more complicated tense is always better. This is not true. The key is to understand the time relationship. When the passage talks about something that happened at an indefinite time in the past but continues to matter now, the present perfect is usually best. Remember also to check subject verb agreement carefully, especially in clauses that follow words like some or many, which signal plurality.
Final Answer:
The correct answer is have suggested.
Discussion & Comments