Horton infiltration – cumulative infiltration under continuous ponding For Horton’s parameters f0 = 7.62 cm/hour, fc = 1.34 cm/hour, and k = 4.182 per hour, compute the cumulative infiltration F (cm) after t = 2 hours, assuming continuous ponding over the soil surface.

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 4.18 cm

Explanation:


Introduction:
Horton’s infiltration model describes how infiltration capacity decays exponentially from an initial value toward a constant capacity as rainfall continues. For design, we often need the cumulative infiltrated depth under continuous ponding, which integrates the capacity curve over time.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Initial capacity f0 = 7.62 cm/h, final capacity fc = 1.34 cm/h, decay constant k = 4.182 h^-1.
  • Surface is ponded (rainfall intensity ≥ infiltration capacity for the duration).
  • Duration t = 2 h; soil is homogeneous during the event.


Concept / Approach:

Horton capacity: f(t) = fc + (f0 − fc) * exp(−k t). The cumulative infiltration under continual ponding is the integral from 0 to t, yielding F(t) = fc * t + (f0 − fc) * (1 − exp(−k t)) / k. Substitute values with consistent units to obtain the infiltrated depth in centimeters.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Compute difference: f0 − fc = 7.62 − 1.34 = 6.28 cm/h.2) Exponential term: exp(−k t) = exp(−4.182 * 2) ≈ exp(−8.364) ≈ 0.00023.3) Transient contribution: (6.28) * (1 − 0.00023) / 4.182 ≈ 6.28 * 0.99977 / 4.182 ≈ 1.50 cm (rounded 1.499).4) Steady contribution: fc * t = 1.34 * 2 = 2.68 cm.5) Total F = 2.68 + 1.50 ≈ 4.18 cm.


Verification / Alternative check:

Since k is large, the capacity decays quickly toward fc, so most of the 2-h total is the steady component (≈2.68 cm), plus a modest transient (≈1.5 cm), consistent with 4.18 cm.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

2.68 cm and 1.34 cm count only one component each; 1.50 cm is only the transient term; 6.52 cm overestimates by summing incorrectly or assuming constant f0.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing infiltration capacity with actual infiltration under non-ponded rainfall; neglecting unit consistency or forgetting to include both terms of the integral.


Final Answer:

4.18 cm

More Questions from GATE Exam Questions

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion