Parallel-plate capacitor with a thin floating metal plate inserted A parallel-plate capacitor has plate area A, separation d, and capacitance C. A thin, perfectly conducting plate P of area A and negligible thickness is inserted midway between the plates but left electrically floating (not connected). What is the new capacitance value?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Understanding how inserting conductors or dielectrics between capacitor plates alters the equivalent capacitance is crucial in sensor design, shielding, and high-voltage insulation. A floating (unconnected) metal sheet partitions the electric field but does not change the net energy storage in a way that alters the overall capacitance, as long as geometry is idealized and fringe effects are neglected.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Original capacitor: area A, separation d, capacitance C = ε A / d (uniform field, no fringing).
  • A thin, perfectly conducting plate of area A is inserted at mid-plane and remains electrically floating (isolated).
  • No dielectric other than vacuum/air; negligible fringing.


Concept / Approach:

The floating conductor divides the single capacitor into two capacitors in series, each with gap d/2. Each sub-capacitance is C1 = ε A / (d/2) = 2C. Two equal capacitors 2C in series combine to give C_eq via 1/C_eq = 1/(2C) + 1/(2C) = 1/C → C_eq = C. Thus, insertion of a floating ideal metal sheet leaves the overall capacitance unchanged in this ideal model.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Compute each half-gap capacitance: C1 = ε A / (d/2) = 2C.Series combination: 1/C_eq = 1/C1 + 1/C1 = 2/(2C) = 1/C.Therefore C_eq = C (no net change).


Verification / Alternative check:

Energy approach: for a fixed voltage V, the energy in each of the two sub-capacitors sums to U_total = 1/2 * C_eq * V^2. With equal partition and equal potential drop, the computed U_total corresponds to C_eq = C, consistent with the series calculation.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

2C would occur if the two halves were in parallel (not the case). 0.5 C or 0.25 C would require increasing separation or placing dielectrics reducing effective ε; none applies. C/3 is arbitrary and not derivable from the geometry.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing a floating insert with a plate connected to one terminal (which would change boundary conditions) or ignoring that two identical series capacitors simply revert to the original C.


Final Answer:

C

More Questions from Materials and Components

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion