Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 4 to 6 feet
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Waste stabilization (oxidation) ponds are low-cost, low-energy biological treatment systems. Proper depth balances sunlight penetration, algal photosynthesis, oxygen transfer, and prevention of anaerobic conditions in the upper layers. This question focuses on the typical design depth used in practice.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Most facultative oxidation ponds are designed near 1–2 meters in depth. Converting to imperial units, this corresponds roughly to 3–6.5 feet. Among the offered ranges, 4–6 feet aligns best with common design practice, supporting algal–bacterial symbiosis while limiting short-circuiting and anaerobic stratification in the active zone.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Translate typical metric depths (1–2 m) into feet (≈3.3–6.6 ft).Compare with options: 4–6 ft sits comfortably within accepted practice.Reject overly shallow (1–3 ft) and overly deep ranges that hinder photosynthesis and oxygen transfer.Select 4–6 ft as the most appropriate typical design depth.
Verification / Alternative check:
Design texts for facultative ponds present depths roughly 1–1.5 m in warm climates and up to ~2 m in some designs, which correspond to the chosen range in feet.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming “deeper is better” for retention time; neglecting that photosynthetic oxygen requires shallow depths.
Final Answer:
4 to 6 feet.
Discussion & Comments