Op-amp as a comparator — open-loop or closed-loop? When an operational amplifier is used as a comparator, is it wired in a closed-loop (negative-feedback) configuration?

Introduction / Context:
While op-amps excel in closed-loop linear applications, a comparator is a decision device that saturates high or low depending on the sign of the input difference. Confusing these use cases leads to miswired circuits and sluggish switching due to unintended feedback dynamics.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Operational amplifier repurposed as a comparator.
• No desire for linear, proportional output — only logic-level decision.
• Power rails and output stage can support saturation transitions.

Concept / Approach:
Comparators operate with high open-loop gain and without linear negative feedback, so even tiny input differences drive the output to a rail. If you add positive feedback (hysteresis), you have a Schmitt trigger — still not a linear closed-loop amplifier. Negative feedback would force a linear transfer function, not the desired rail-to-rail switching behavior.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Datasheets for dedicated comparators show open-loop transfer and hysteresis options; op-amp datasheets warn against using linear negative feedback for comparator service because of slew-rate and recovery concerns.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Ignoring input common-mode limits; failing to add hysteresis; not providing output pull-ups for open-collector comparators; expecting rail-to-rail swing from general-purpose op-amps.

Final Answer:
Incorrect — comparators use open-loop (no linear negative feedback)