Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Tasteless
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Human gustation recognizes basic taste qualities (commonly sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami). “Tasteless” denotes the absence of detectable taste, not a taste quality itself, providing a crisp classification boundary.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Differentiate “taste category” from “lack of taste.” The latter does not fit within the taxonomy of basic tastes and therefore stands apart.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Tag sweet/sour/salty as basic tastes.2) Tag tasteless as absence of taste.3) The only non-taste category is “Tasteless.”Verification / Alternative check:Try substitution: “This soup tastes tasteless” reports lack of flavor, while “tastes sweet/sour/salty” reports a specific taste.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:They are canonical taste qualities and belong to one semantic class.
Common Pitfalls:Do not mix “bland” (low intensity) with “tasteless” (no taste perceived); the question contrasts category vs absence.
Final Answer:Tasteless
Discussion & Comments