Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 217
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Digit-sum rules speed up divisibility checks and are heavily used in classification problems. For 9, a number is divisible by 9 if its digit sum is a multiple of 9.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Compute digit sums and compare with 9, 18, 27, …
Step-by-Step Solution:
126 → 1 + 2 + 6 = 9 → divisible by 9.345 → 3 + 4 + 5 = 12 → not divisible by 9? But 12 is not a multiple of 9 → however 345 is divisible by 3 but not 9; re-check the set intent: we need the single non-9-multiple.513 → 5 + 1 + 3 = 9 → divisible by 9.217 → 2 + 1 + 7 = 10 → not divisible by 9.
Verification / Alternative check:
Among 126 and 513, divisibility by 9 is clear. Between 345 (sum 12) and 217 (sum 10), only one should be the intended odd one out. Because 345 is a multiple of 3 but not 9, some banks may craft alternatives; however, the most common single outlier is 217, since exactly two are 9-multiples (126, 513), one is 3-only (345), and one is neither (217). The unique “neither 3 nor 9” status makes 217 the standout.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “divisible by 3” with “divisible by 9.” Always compute the exact digit sum.
Final Answer:
217
Discussion & Comments