Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 9, 64
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Square recognition and adjacency (n^2 and (n+1)^2) provide a clean basis for classification. Three pairs are consecutive squares; one is not.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Express each number as an integer square and check whether the exponents differ by 1.
Step-by-Step Solution:
(25, 36) → (5^2, 6^2) ✓(100, 121) → (10^2, 11^2) ✓(144, 169) → (12^2, 13^2) ✓(9, 64) → (3^2, 8^2) ✗ (gap of 5 in the bases)
Verification / Alternative check:
Compute differences: (n+1)^2 − n^2 = 2n + 1; for (5,6) that is 11; for (10,11) that is 21; for (12,13) that is 25. The non-consecutive pair will not fit this form consistently.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming any two squares constitute a valid pair. Here, adjacency of bases is the key.
Final Answer:
9, 64
Discussion & Comments