Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Mirror : Glass
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:An analogy compares relationships. In “Chair : Wood,” the first item is an everyday object and the second is the typical material from which that object is made. To solve the analogy, we must find another pair that preserves this “object → material” relation rather than a “container → content,” “tool → action,” or any other mismatch.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Identify which option expresses the same structural relation. We test each choice to see whether the second term is the basic substance used to make the first, in the most common, textbook sense.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Check “Book : Print” — “print” is a process/ink impression, not a material itself.Check “Mirror : Glass” — a mirror is characteristically made of glass with a reflective coating. This matches “object → material.”Check “Plate : Food” — food is the content placed on a plate (container → content), not the material of the plate.Check “Purse : Money” — money is content stored in a purse, not the purse’s material.Check “Bottle : Plastic” — many bottles are plastic; while this is also “object → material,” exam keys typically select the most canonical, unambiguous textbook pair. “Mirror : Glass” is the most universal mapping.Verification / Alternative check:“Mirror : Glass” satisfies the precise parallel to “Chair : Wood.” Although bottles can be glass or plastic, mirrors are classically glass-based, reinforcing the intended relation more consistently.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Book : Print — process/content, not material.Plate : Food — container : content.Purse : Money — container : content.Bottle : Plastic — also object : material, but less canonical across contexts; retained as a plausible distractor.Common Pitfalls:Confusing content or process with material; choosing a pair that fits loosely rather than the clearest, standard mapping.
Final Answer:Mirror : Glass
Discussion & Comments