Tool identification: The numerical method of specifying a single-point tool by listing its key angles and features is called the tool signature. Is this statement correct?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Correct

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Single-point cutting tools are defined by a set of geometric parameters (rake angles, clearance angles, nose radius, etc.). A compact way to communicate these values for manufacturing, inspection, and setup is the tool signature system.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Use of ASA, ORS/ISO, or NRS systems to denote angular values and nose radius.
  • Angles are typically recorded in degrees; nose radius in mm.
  • Applies to turning tools and other single-point geometries.


Concept / Approach:
A tool signature is a sequence of numbers, each representing a specific element of tool geometry in an agreed order. For example, in one common convention: Back rake – Side rake – End relief – Side relief – End cutting edge angle – Side cutting edge angle – Nose radius. Listing these in numerals allows unambiguous identification and replication of a tool's cutting geometry.



Step-by-Step Explanation:

Identify the relevant geometry set (rakes, clearances, edge angles, nose radius).Assign each value to its position within the signature sequence as per the chosen standard.Express the set numerically to fully specify the tool.Use this signature across design, grinding, and setup instructions.


Verification / Alternative check:
Textbook examples show signatures like 8-6-5-5-10-15-0.8 mm, which can be interpreted directly into the corresponding tool angles and nose radius.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Labeling the statement “Incorrect” would ignore established nomenclature used universally in toolrooms and machining handbooks.



Common Pitfalls:
Mixing different systems (ASA vs ORS) without noting the order; omitting the nose radius value, leading to incomplete specification.



Final Answer:
Correct

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion