Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 0.6 to 0.7 times flooding velocity
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Flooding limits the maximum vapor rate in trayed and packed columns. Designers choose operating vapor velocities sufficiently below the flooding point to ensure stable mass transfer, acceptable pressure drop, and turndown capability. Non-foaming services permit higher allowable fractions than foaming systems, but a safety margin is still required.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Heuristics and vendor practices commonly recommend operation at roughly 60–70% of calculated flooding velocity for conservative, robust design. This region offers good mass transfer while limiting entrainment and weeping. Very high approaches to flooding reduce operability and increase sensitivity to disturbances.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Design manuals list 0.6–0.8 as typical; many practitioners choose ~0.65–0.7 for steady operation with margin for fouling and variability.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Not adjusting for foaming tendency, surface tension effects, or fouling; these may require even lower fractions.
Final Answer:
0.6 to 0.7 times flooding velocity
Discussion & Comments