Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 144
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question gives a sequence of numbers that decreases in a non-linear way and asks you to find the next term. The pattern is hidden in the sequence of differences between consecutive terms, which themselves follow a simple rule. Such questions test your ability to recognize patterns several levels deep.
Given Data / Assumptions:
The sequence is: 194, 194, 191, 183, 168, ?. You must decide which of the options 154, 156, 144 or 143 should replace the question mark. We assume the sequence is generated by subtracting increasingly larger numbers, with a pattern visible in those subtractions.
Concept / Approach:
When a sequence is not simple arithmetic or geometric, the most effective approach is to calculate first differences and then second differences. Often, the first differences follow a simple progression (such as quadratic or based on odd numbers), and that progression allows us to predict the next term.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Compute the first differences.194 → 194: difference = 0.194 → 191: difference = -3.191 → 183: difference = -8.183 → 168: difference = -15.Step 2: List these differences: 0, -3, -8, -15.Step 3: Compute the second differences (differences of the differences).-3 - 0 = -3.-8 - (-3) = -5.-15 - (-8) = -7.Step 4: We now see the second differences are -3, -5, -7, which is a sequence of consecutive negative odd numbers. The next second difference should be -9.Step 5: To get the next first difference, subtract 9 from the last first difference: -15 - 9 = -24.Step 6: Apply this to find the next term: 168 + (-24) = 168 - 24 = 144.
Verification / Alternative check:
We can reconstruct the pattern of first differences: 0, -3, -8, -15, -24. The differences between these are -3, -5, -7, -9, which is a clear and consistent pattern of decreasing by consecutive odd numbers. None of the options other than 144 leads to this neat sequence of second differences, so 144 must be the correct choice.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
If we choose 154, 156 or 143, the resulting first difference from 168 would not be -24 and would break the second-difference pattern based on consecutive odd numbers. For example, 154 would give a difference of -14, which does not fit naturally after -15 if we expect larger negative jumps. Therefore, these alternatives are inconsistent with the discovered rule.
Common Pitfalls:
Some students stop after observing the first differences and fail to notice a clear pattern, then resort to guessing. It is important to remember that sometimes patterns appear only in second or even third differences, so computing them systematically is a valuable technique for number series questions.
Final Answer:
The next term in the sequence, preserving the pattern in consecutive differences, is 144.
Discussion & Comments