In a standard multi-view drawing, the front, top, and right-side views are common. If no dimensions or unique details are needed on the right-side view, what may the drafter do to simplify the drawing? Choose the best practice for view reduction.

Introduction / Context:
Orthographic drawings should be complete but not redundant. Each view should add information (shape, dimensions, or clarity). If a view duplicates information without adding value, it increases clutter and review time.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Front and top views already convey necessary geometry and dimensions.
• The right-side view adds no new dimensions or unique features.
• Standards encourage economy of views while preserving clarity.

Concept / Approach:

When a view is redundant, it can be safely omitted. Removing unnecessary views focuses attention on critical features and reduces potential for conflicting annotations. If symmetry or duplication exists, fewer views are acceptable provided the object remains unambiguous.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Many CAD standards and textbooks recommend the minimum number of views needed to fully describe the part, sometimes just one or two for simple or symmetric geometry.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Leave the view as is: keeps clutter and adds no information.

Use the left view instead: merely substitutes a mirrored redundancy unless a specific left-side feature exists.

None of the above: incorrect, because elimination is acceptable practice.

Common Pitfalls:

Removing a view that actually contains unique chamfers, tapers, or hole orientations; always verify before deleting.

Final Answer:

eliminate the view