Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 1/2 depth
Explanation:
Introduction:
This question checks the characteristic proportion of a most economical (efficient) trapezoidal channel section. The most economical section minimizes wetted perimeter for a given discharge, thereby reducing frictional losses.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
For the most economical section, geometric conditions arise from minimizing wetted perimeter P for given A. These lead to proportional relationships between depth and widths. A key result typically cited is that the hydraulic mean depth equals half the depth of flow for the economical trapezoidal section.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Textbook results also show companion conditions such as the half of the top width equalling the length of one sloping side in the optimal case. Using these and substituting into m = A / T reproduces m = y / 2.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
1/2 breadth: Breadth does not directly govern m; m depends on A and T. 1/2 sloping side: Side length influences wetted perimeter but m is not half of a side length. 1/4(depth + breadth): No standard optimality condition gives this relation.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing hydraulic radius R = A / P with hydraulic mean depth m = A / T; mixing properties of rectangular, triangular, and trapezoidal optimal sections.
Final Answer:
1/2 depth
Discussion & Comments