Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if only assumption I is implicit.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The statement contrasts an increase in the number of domestic factories with the continued reliance on imports. The most economical explanation is a present shortfall: capacity/production still lags demand. The statement does not require any claim about future demand growth; it compares current production capacity against current needs.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
“Still import” is a present tense outcome. That requires a current production–demand gap (I). Projecting future increases (II) is not necessary to justify the present import behavior and is therefore not implicit.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Even if future demand were flat, a current deficit would still require imports—confirming I without II.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing present necessity (imports now) with speculative future growth.
Final Answer:
Only Assumption I is implicit.
Discussion & Comments