Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if only assumption I is implicit.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The statement contrasts an increase in the number of domestic factories with the continued reliance on imports. The most economical explanation is a present shortfall: capacity/production still lags demand. The statement does not require any claim about future demand growth; it compares current production capacity against current needs.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:“Still import” is a present tense outcome. That requires a current production–demand gap (I). Projecting future increases (II) is not necessary to justify the present import behavior and is therefore not implicit.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Translate contrast: more factories ≠ enough total production.2) Imports signal unmet current demand (I).3) No claim about future demand trajectories is needed (¬II).Verification / Alternative check:Even if future demand were flat, a current deficit would still require imports—confirming I without II.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only II/Either/Both: improperly add a future-oriented claim not required by the present-tense statement.Neither: false because a production shortfall is necessary to explain ongoing imports.Common Pitfalls:Confusing present necessity (imports now) with speculative future growth.
Final Answer:Only Assumption I is implicit.
Discussion & Comments