Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: either (b) or (c)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context: Measuring the temperature of molten metal and slag in ironmaking/steelmaking requires non-contact instruments. The intense heat, splashing, and corrosive environment make immersion sensors impractical except for specialized disposable probes. Non-contact pyrometry is the standard solution.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach: Both optical and radiation pyrometers infer temperature from emitted thermal radiation. The terms are often used interchangeably; “optical” historically refers to brightness or disappearing-filament types, while “radiation” may emphasize total or narrow-band radiance. In either case, non-contact sighting at these temperatures is accurate and safe when emissivity and surface conditions are managed.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Eliminate contact options that cannot survive immersion in molten streams.Select non-contact methods that work at >1400°C: optical or radiation pyrometry.Conclude that either (b) or (c) is suitable.Verification / Alternative check: Steel plants routinely use optical/radiation pyrometers aimed at the tap stream or molten bath to monitor temperature, often alongside occasional disposable immersion thermocouples for cross-checks.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Chromel–alumel thermocouple — contact method; not practical for continuous non-contact measurement in molten metal streams.Common Pitfalls: Ignoring emissivity and viewing window cleanliness; proper calibration and sighting are required for accurate readings.
Final Answer: either (b) or (c)
Discussion & Comments