Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: All of the above
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Shallow foundation embedment must ensure bearing capacity, protection against seasonal effects (scour, frost, shrink–swell), and construction feasibility. Practical minimum depths vary with soil type and site conditions even when ultimate capacity is ample.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:On sands, embedment of roughly 0.8–1.0 m helps limit scour and seasonal disturbance. On clays, slightly greater depths (about 0.9–1.6 m) mitigate shrink–swell and seasonal moisture fluctuations. On competent rock, only enough embedment to seat and key the footing (5–50 cm) may be required, provided bearing surface is sound and protected.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Match each soil type with a practical minimum embedment range.Check rationale: seasonal stability and protection drive minimums more than ultimate capacity on strong strata.Select the option acknowledging all three ranges.Verification / Alternative check:Local codes may specify frost depth controls; where frost is significant, minimum depths exceed these general ranges.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Using ultimate capacity alone to set depth; neglecting erosion or desiccation effects; ignoring local code requirements.
Final Answer:All of the above
Discussion & Comments