Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 50 mm
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Ballast grading and maximum particle size must suit the sleeper type and seat geometry. Metal sleepers with rounded edges tolerate slightly larger particles than sharp-edged seats because point-contact cutting is reduced. Choosing the correct size balances drainage, load distribution, and maintenance effort.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Ballast size affects (1) contact stresses at sleeper interfaces, (2) packing stability, and (3) permeability. With rounded edges, the risk of cutting is lower; a 50 mm nominal maximum size often provides robust interlock and drainage while reducing the fine generation that would occur with undersized ballast under heavy traffic.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assess sleeper-seat edge: rounded edges reduce stress concentration.Select a size that maintains interlock yet avoids excessive point loading.Industry practice recommends up to about 50 mm nominal size in this case.
Verification / Alternative check:
Track standards frequently specify 50 mm nominal maximum for mainline ballast with metal sleepers, confirmed by performance data on settlement and abrasion.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
30 mm or 20 mm: Too small for mainline stability; tends to break down and clog.40 mm: Acceptable in some contexts but 50 mm is the common upper nominal for rounded metal seats.25 cm: Dimensionally incorrect (far too large).
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
50 mm
Discussion & Comments