Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Digital memory elements such as latches and flip-flops are designed to store information. The statement claims that circuits with memory normally revert to their original state when the input is removed. Understanding whether a memory device “springs back” or “holds” is fundamental in sequential logic design, timing analysis, and state-machine behavior.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Bistable circuits have two stable states maintained by positive feedback. The defining property of a memory element is that, after being forced into a state, it retains that state when the stimulus is removed, provided power is maintained and there is no asynchronous clear/preset event. They do not “revert” unless specifically designed with auto-clear or unless leakage/noise forces a change (which proper design avoids).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Examine an SR latch built from cross-coupled NAND gates. After asserting S to set Q = 1, returning S to inactive leaves Q = 1 because the feedback sustains the condition. Similar behavior appears in clocked flip-flops between edges.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Correct” contradicts the core property of memory retention. “Applies only to analog memories” is irrelevant; we are discussing digital bistables. “Depends solely on power-supply ripple” confuses noise susceptibility with fundamental operation.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming inputs must be continuously driven to hold a state; misinterpreting metastability or power-on defaults as “reversion.”
Final Answer:
Incorrect
Discussion & Comments