Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Greek
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Megasthenes is an important figure in ancient Indian and Greek history because he provided one of the earliest foreign accounts of the Mauryan Empire. He wrote a work called Indika, which described the geography, society and administration of India as he observed it at the court of Chandragupta Maurya. Knowing which empire he represented helps students connect Greek and Indian history and understand how ancient civilisations interacted through diplomacy and trade.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The key concept is that Megasthenes was a Greek from the Hellenistic world and served the Seleucid ruler Seleucus. The Seleucid Empire was a successor state of Alexander the Great empire and is considered part of the broader Greek or Hellenistic world. Roman, Ottoman and Egyptian empires belong to different times and regions. The approach is to recall that Megasthenes was a Greek diplomat and that his writings are part of Greek historiography, not Roman or Ottoman literature.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that Megasthenes came from the Greek world and worked under Seleucus, a general of Alexander who founded a Hellenistic empire.Step 2: Understand that when he visited India, he did so as a representative of this Hellenistic Greek power.Step 3: Recognise that the Roman Empire rose to prominence later, and Megasthenes is not identified as a Roman ambassador.Step 4: Note that the Ottoman Empire is a much later Islamic polity that did not exist in Megasthenes time.Step 5: Understand that Egyptian civilisation is ancient but Megasthenes is not associated with it as a diplomatic representative.Step 6: Therefore, among the options, Greek is the correct description of the empire or cultural sphere for which he served as an ambassador.
Verification / Alternative check:
Standard history texts state that after Alexander death, his generals divided his empire and Seleucus took control of large territories stretching from the Near East to parts of Asia. Megasthenes was appointed as an envoy to the Mauryan court, probably to negotiate borders and maintain relations. His Greek background is mentioned explicitly in many sources, and his work Indika is classified among Greek ethnographic writings. There is no mention of Roman, Ottoman or Egyptian political structures in relation to him. This confirms that Greek is the correct classification for the type of empire he represented.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
The Roman option is wrong because Megasthenes lived before Rome became a dominant imperial power and because he is consistently described as Greek. The Ottoman option is wrong because the Ottoman Empire arose many centuries later in the medieval period. The Egyptian option is wrong because even though there were Greek rulers in Egypt after Alexander conquest, Megasthenes was not famous as an Egyptian envoy but as a Greek envoy in general and a representative of the Seleucid realm. Therefore, none of these alternatives match the known historical record.
Common Pitfalls:
Students may confuse different classical empires and assume that any foreign ambassador to India must have been Roman, especially if they think mainly of Rome when they hear the word empire. Another pitfall is to ignore the timeline and choose Ottoman or Egyptian simply because those names sound familiar. To avoid such errors, always link Megasthenes with Greek culture, the Seleucid Empire and the title of his work Indika, which is discussed in the context of Greek writings about India.
Final Answer:
Megasthenes served as an ambassador of a Greek Hellenistic empire when he visited the court of Chandragupta Maurya in ancient India.
Discussion & Comments