Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: It is impossible to construct an engine operating in a cycle whose sole effect is to convert heat completely into work.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The second law imposes fundamental limits on energy conversion. The Kelvin–Planck statement focuses on cyclic heat engines and forbids 100% conversion of heat from a single reservoir into work with no other effect.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The Kelvin–Planck statement: No heat engine, operating in a cycle, can produce net work while exchanging heat with only one reservoir. Some heat must be rejected to a lower-temperature sink. This is equivalent to saying that thermal efficiency cannot reach unity for a cyclic engine.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Consider a hypothetical engine that absorbs Q from a single reservoir and delivers W = Q with no rejection.2) Such an engine would violate the Kelvin–Planck statement.3) Real engines must reject heat Q_out so that W = Q_in − Q_out.4) Therefore option (a) correctly states the prohibition.
Verification / Alternative check:
The Kelvin–Planck and Clausius statements are equivalent; option (c) paraphrases the Clausius statement (no device can cause heat to flow from cold to hot without external work), not Kelvin–Planck.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming perfect insulation permits perfect conversion; second law limitations are not removed by insulation alone.
Final Answer:
It is impossible to construct an engine operating in a cycle whose sole effect is to convert heat completely into work.
Discussion & Comments