Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: No; that ratio defines blading/diagram or stage efficiency, not mechanical efficiency
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Turbine performance uses several efficiency definitions: nozzle efficiency, diagram (blading) efficiency, stage efficiency, and mechanical efficiency. Confusion among these terms leads to incorrect diagnostics.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Mechanical efficiency is the ratio of brake (shaft) power to rotor power (power developed in the blades). The quoted ratio compares rotor work to stage energy input, which corresponds to diagram (blading) efficiency or stage efficiency, not mechanical efficiency.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify the numerator: energy to blades → rotor work.Identify the denominator: total stage energy supplied.This ratio reflects how effectively the stage converts available enthalpy drop into rotor work → diagram/stage efficiency.Mechanical efficiency = shaft (deliverable) power / rotor power, accounting for mechanical losses.
Verification / Alternative check:
Standard definitions list: η_mech = P_shaft / P_rotor; η_nozzle relates kinetic energy to isentropic drop; η_stage = W_rotor / Δh_stage, aligning with the statement's ratio.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Using “mechanical efficiency” to describe fluid-dynamic conversion quality; that is a separate (diagram/stage) efficiency.
Final Answer:
No; that ratio defines blading/diagram or stage efficiency, not mechanical efficiency
Discussion & Comments