Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Both (a) and (b)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Designing safe non-eroding velocities in open drains is central to stormwater engineering. Excess velocity can scour bed and sides; too low a velocity promotes deposition. The permissible velocity depends on material and lining type.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Empirical permissible velocities correlate to material resistance: rock/gravel or stone lining tolerates higher velocities than bare earth. Around 1.0–1.5 m/s is often acceptable for stone-lined or rock/gravel sections, while unlined silty or sandy beds require much lower velocities to prevent scour.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Design handbooks provide tables of safe mean velocities: stone-pitched channels allow higher velocities than bare cohesive soils. Many municipal standards accept ≈1.5 m/s for stone-lined sections depending on gradation and jointing.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(a) or (b) alone are incomplete. (d) is false because 1.5 m/s is not generally permissible for unlined erodible soils but is permissible for stone/rock lining. (e) Bare cohesive clay often needs lower velocities to avoid erosion.
Common Pitfalls:
Using peak (instantaneous) rather than mean velocity; ignoring side-slope protection and turbulence at bends, junctions, or culvert outlets.
Final Answer:
Both (a) and (b)
Discussion & Comments