Hot shortness prevention in steels Which alloying element is most effective at reducing the formation of low-melting iron sulphide (FeS) in steel, thereby preventing hot shortness during hot working?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: manganese

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Hot shortness in steels arises when iron sulphide forms along grain boundaries, melting at hot-working temperatures and causing intergranular cracking. Alloy design can mitigate this by tying up sulphur into benign compounds.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Trace sulphur is present as an impurity in many steels.
  • Prevention approach: form high-melting sulphides that do not wet grain boundaries.
  • Standard practices include intentional Mn additions in steelmaking.


Concept / Approach:
Manganese has strong affinity for sulphur, forming manganese sulphide (MnS), which has a much higher melting point than FeS and is non-deleterious at hot-working temperatures. MnS particles are typically dispersed and can be controlled by processing; they prevent FeS films from forming at grain boundaries.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Recognize problem: FeS melts at low temperature and causes hot brittleness.Select solution: add Mn so that S preferentially forms MnS.Result: reduced hot shortness and improved hot workability.Therefore, manganese is the correct alloying element.


Verification / Alternative check:
Steelmaking practice maintains Mn/S ratio above a threshold (often >= 8) to ensure sulphur is bound as MnS rather than FeS.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Chromium, nickel, vanadium, and molybdenum offer other benefits (corrosion resistance, hardenability, precipitation strengthening) but are not primary sulphur fixers in standard steels.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing desulphurisation in the ladle (with fluxes) versus in-solid solution control; Mn addition is a direct metallurgical fix inside the steel matrix.


Final Answer:
manganese

More Questions from Engineering Materials

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion