Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only (b) and (c)
Explanation:
Introduction:Industrial firing applications often specify residual fuel oils by sulphur and viscosity classes. LSHS is a widely referenced term in Indian industry and examinations. The question checks accurate expansion and practical suitability for furnaces.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:LSHS literally expands to low sulphur heavy stock. Compared with generic furnace oils, its key selling point is reduced sulphur, which helps lower SOx emissions and scale or corrosion risks. Viscosity depends on exact blend/grade; LSHS need not be more viscous than oils explicitly sold as high-viscosity furnace oil (HVFO).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Confirm the acronym: “low sulphur heavy stock” is correct.Consider application: lower sulphur content makes it attractive for furnaces concerned with emissions and product quality.Evaluate viscosity claim: labeling something HVFO implies higher viscosity than typical residual stocks; claiming LSHS is more viscous than HVFO is not generally true.Verification / Alternative check:Fuel oil purchasing specs separate sulphur content (LS vs HS) from viscosity classes (e.g., 80–380 cSt @ 50°C). LS and viscosity are independent levers; “HVFO” signals higher viscosity explicitly.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Assuming “low sulphur” automatically implies “high viscosity” or vice versa; they are specified separately.
Final Answer:Only (b) and (c)
Discussion & Comments