Premises: (1) Some engineers are fools. (2) Anand is an engineer. Conclusions: (I) Some fools are engineers. (II) Anand is a fool.
Concept/Approach‘‘Some engineers are fools’’ (E∩F ≠ ∅) is symmetric as a particular proposition; we can restate it as ‘‘Some fools are engineers’’ without loss.Test Conclusion IDirect conversion of a particular proposition is valid ⇒ I follows.Test Conclusion IIKnowing only that some engineers are fools does not allow us to classify every engineer. Anand may or may not be in the overlap. ⇒ II does not follow.Common pitfallsTreating ‘‘some’’ as ‘‘all.’’ Particular statements never license universal individual claims without extra data.Final AnswerOnly conclusion I follows.
Discussion & Comments