Introduction / Context:
Public safety is paramount in poisoning outbreaks. Responses should rapidly eliminate exposure, investigate, and hold culprits accountable—without resorting to extrajudicial or irrational measures.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Confirmed cluster of critical illness linked to a specific local liquor shop.
- Spurious/toxic alcohol can contaminate wider supply chains.
- Due process must be followed for enforcement.
Concept / Approach:
- Remove suspected products from circulation pending testing.
- Investigate and prosecute responsible parties using applicable criminal laws.
- Avoid actions that are punitive without legal basis.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I follows: A temporary, area-wide suspension to test stocks prevents further harm. Scope can be risk-based, but the principle stands.II does not follow: Forcing the owner to leave town and sell elsewhere is unlawful and unsafe; it exports the risk.III follows: Probable criminal negligence or adulteration warrants arrest and trial under due process.
Verification / Alternative check:
Standard responses include seizures, lab testing, tracing supply chains, and prosecution—matching I and III.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I and II / II and III / All: Each includes the extralegal step II.III only: Omits urgent exposure control.
Common Pitfalls:
Acting punitively without legality; ignoring the immediate need to stop further poisonings.
Final Answer:
Only I and III follow
Discussion & Comments