Statement: The exodus from villages to cities is detrimental to both. Courses of Action: Rural postings must be made mandatory. There should be fewer trains linking cities to smaller places. Employment generation scheme should be launched in rural areas.

Only II follows
Only I and II follow
Only III follows
Only II and III follow

Correct Answer: Only III follows

Explanation:

Clearly, the exodus cannot be stopped by reducing the number of trains. So, II does not follow. The exodus occurs primarily due to better employment opportunities and facilities in the cities. Hence, it can be prevented not by compulsion but by making conditions favourable for those residing in villages. So, I does not follow while III follows.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Statement: The exodus from villages to cities is detrimental to both. Courses of Action: Rural postings must be made mandatory. There should be fewer trains linking cities to smaller places. Employment generation scheme should be launched in rural areas.

More Questions from Course of Action

Discussion & Comments