Statement–Courses of Action (duty-free technology parks for foreign hardware manufacturing): Duty-free technology parks for foreign firms to manufacture electronic hardware are proposed across the country; decide which course(s) follow—(I) implement promptly to boost exports and foreign exchange, (II) do not implement because it will hinder indigenous production—based solely on what is stated.

Given data

• Proposal: Establish duty-free tech parks for foreign firms to manufacture electronic hardware.
• Course I: Implement to augment forex via exports.
• Course II: Do not implement since it may hinder indigenous production.

Concept / Approach
A course follows if it reasonably operationalises the proposal's stated objective; speculative harms not mentioned do not negate it.

Step-by-step evaluation
Step 1: The proposal aims at hardware manufacturing; exports reasonably improve forex—so I follows.Step 2: II introduces an unstated negative effect (hindering domestic production) without evidence; it does not follow from the statement.

Verification / Alternative
Safeguards for domestic industry can coexist with parks; their mere proposal doesn't imply harm.

Common pitfalls

• Rejecting proposals based on conjectural downsides absent in the statement.

Final Answer
Only I follows.