Geodetic visibility of a lighthouse over the sea horizon A lighthouse has a height of 120 m above mean sea level and is just visible above the horizon from a ship at sea level. Considering the combined correction for Earth’s curvature and standard atmospheric refraction, determine the correct horizontal distance between the ship and the lighthouse, expressed in metres.

Civil Engineering GATE Exam Questions Difficulty: Medium
Choose an option
  • A
    39.098
  • B
    42.226
  • C
    39098
  • D
    42226
  • E
    40000

Answer

Correct Answer: 42226

Explanation

Introduction:Surveying and geodesy problems often involve visibility to the horizon. When an object such as a lighthouse is just visible, the line of sight grazes the Earth’s curved surface. The practical formula for horizon distance incorporates a standard refraction allowance, which slightly bends light downward and increases the visible range compared to a vacuum condition.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Lighthouse height h = 120 m (observer at near sea level).
  • Standard combined correction for curvature and refraction is used.
  • Distance sought is along the surface (plan distance) in metres.

Concept / Approach:

With standard refraction, the horizon distance from a height h (in metres) is commonly taken as d(km) = 3.86 * sqrt(h). Without refraction, a typical factor is about 3.57. Here we use 3.86 as the combined curvature–refraction factor to compute the visibility distance to the horizon for h = 120 m and then convert to metres.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Compute sqrt(h): sqrt(120) ≈ 10.954.Apply combined formula: d(km) = 3.86 * 10.954 ≈ 42.26 km.Convert to metres: d(m) ≈ 42.26 * 1000 ≈ 42260 m.Match to options: 42226 m (rounded as per surveying tables).

Verification / Alternative check:

Using the no-refraction factor (3.57) would give about 39.1 km (≈ 39098 m), which matches one distractor and confirms why including refraction increases the distance to about 42.2 km.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

39.098 and 39098 correspond to the no-refraction estimate; 42.226 (metres) misplaces units by three orders of magnitude; 40000 is a rough round-number guess, not the refined value.

Common Pitfalls:

Confusing kilometres with metres; using the curvature-only factor (3.57) instead of the combined curvature–refraction factor; forgetting that visibility distance scales with the square root of height.

Final Answer:

42226

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion