Insert a 5-letter block so the consonant-heavy pattern becomes symmetric and each “dc/nc/cd” fragment reappears in a consistent rotation: nc—dcn—cddc—n—ddcnn—d

Difficulty: Hard

Correct Answer: nccdn

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Here we face a dense consonant pattern using only n, c, and d. Such series often hide a rotational mirror where short fragments like “nc”, “dc”, and “cd” recur in a fixed order. We must pick a 5-letter insertion that restores this rotation across the visible anchors.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Scaffold: nc — dcn — cddc — n — ddcnn — d
  • Exactly five letters fill the dashed slot.
  • Joins must re-create a repeating rotation of the trigraphs without duplicating or skipping.


Concept / Approach:
Check each 5-letter candidate by simulating joins at the boundaries: “…nc | [block] | dcn | [block] | cddc | [block] | n | [block] | ddcnn | [block] | d”. The correct choice should maintain the cycling of pairwise fragments (nc→cd→dn→nc… style) and produce symmetric echoing near “cddc”.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Insert “nccdn”.Left seam “…nc n…” keeps the nc motif, while “…n ccd n…” across the middle preserves cd/dc alternations near “cddc”.Right seam “…ddcnn d” closes neatly with no doubled or missing letter at the edge.


Verification / Alternative check:
Check that every join preserves a plausible nc/dc/cd rotation and does not yield triplets like “nnn” or “ccc”. “nccdn” is the only option that keeps balanced alternation and a clean closure.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • cdndc: Creates mismatched seams at the “cddc” core.
  • dnncc: Produces “nnn” and “ccc” runs, breaking the alternation.
  • dcndd: Leads to excessive “dd” near the right tail.
  • None of these: Not applicable because “nccdn” works.


Common Pitfalls:
Optimizing one seam while ignoring another; overlooking the central palindrome-like “cddc”.


Final Answer:
nccdn

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion