Complete the mixed p–n–m–o letter run by inserting a 6-letter block that preserves the “mnop” cycling with mirrored interleaves: – op – mo – n – – p n m o p –

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: mnpomn

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The sequence features letters m, n, o, p in intertwined order. Many such items hide an “mnop” cycle that is sometimes mirrored or interleaved. The task is to pick the candidate block that, when inserted, reconstructs the smooth mnop flow without introducing mismatched junctions.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Scaffold: – op – mo – n – – p n m o p –
  • One 6-letter block must be placed into the dashes left-to-right.
  • Joins at “…op”, “…mo”, “…n…”, and “…pnmop…” must remain smooth.


Concept / Approach:
Test each 6-letter option by simulating the joins around fixed anchors “op”, “mo”, and the tail “…pnmop…”. The correct block must respect the mnop rotation while aligning head-tail boundaries cleanly.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Trial with “mnpomn” (m n p o m n):Preceding “…op” joins into “op m…”, continuing as “…opmn…”.Around “…mo” the sequence “…m o m…” remains consistent with mnop stepping and local mirroring.Near the final “…pnmop” anchor, “mnpomn” dovetails to preserve the mnop cadence without doubled letters at the seam.


Verification / Alternative check:
Other options create harsh seams (e.g., “mm” or “oo”) or swap the interleave order, breaking the mnop beat at one of the anchors.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • mnompn: Misaligns around the “…mo” and “…pnmop” joints.
  • mpnmop: Creates a tight “…mopm…” seam that stutters the cycle.
  • mnpmo: Too short (5), cannot fill all required positions.
  • None of these: Not applicable since “mnpomn” works.


Common Pitfalls:
Matching only local anchors but missing the global mnop cadence leading to a broken seam elsewhere.


Final Answer:
mnpomn

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion