Read the following passage carefully about law, order, and the role of the police in society. Then answer the following question. Which one of the following statements is NOT implied by the passage about the function of laws and of the force that enforces them?

Introduction / Context:
In this reading comprehension question, the passage explains the purpose of laws and the role of the force that enforces them, mainly the police under the control of the government. The passage contrasts good citizens, who obey the law willingly, with bad citizens, who are restrained by fear of punishment. The question asks which statement is NOT implied by the passage. That means we must choose the option that does not follow naturally from the ideas presented in the text.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Laws are made to protect life, property, and the rights of communities and castes.
• Customs and ceremonies are permitted as long as they do not violate the rights of others.
• Good citizens obey laws freely and consider the well being of others.
• Bad citizens obey only because they fear the consequences of breaking the law.
• A minister, working through the Inspector General of Police, controls law and order.

Concept / Approach:
To find what is NOT implied, we must read each option and ask whether the idea is supported, suggested, or compatible with the passage. If the passage clearly supports an option, then it is not the answer. The correct choice must introduce an idea that goes beyond the passage or directly contradicts it. Special attention should be given to extreme words like absolutely and unconditionally, because the passage clearly mentions limits on some rights.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Examine option A. Laws protect those who respect and obey them. The passage explains that laws protect the lives and property of law abiding people. This clearly supports the idea in option A, so it is implied. Step 2: Examine option C. A criminal is deterred from committing crimes by fear of the law. The passage states that bad citizens are restrained from breaking laws by fear of the consequences. This matches option C, so it is implied. Step 3: Examine option D. The forces of law help to transform irresponsible citizens into responsible ones. The passage says that the necessary steps to compel bad citizens to act as good citizens are taken by this force. That clearly supports the spirit of option D. Step 4: Examine option B. Laws ensure religious and social rights absolutely and unconditionally. The passage says that communities and castes may carry out their customs and ceremonies as long as they do not conflict with the rights of others. This means such rights are conditional, not absolute. Therefore option B contradicts the passage. Step 5: Because option B introduces the false idea that such rights are unconditional, it is the only statement that is not implied by the passage.

Verification / Alternative check:
Another way to check the answer is to focus on the conditional phrase as long as they do not conflict with the rights of others. Any option that removes this condition and presents the rights as absolute must be incorrect. Option B does exactly that by stating absolutely and unconditionally. Hence, it cannot be implied by the passage, while the other options all reflect the ideas in the text accurately.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A is supported because the passage mentions protection of law abiding men. Option C is supported because the passage states that bad citizens are restrained by fear of consequences. Option D is supported because the passage describes how the enforcing force compels bad citizens to behave like good citizens.

Common Pitfalls:
Many learners rush through such questions and simply choose the option that sounds negative without checking the text. Another common mistake is to ignore qualifiers like as long as or provided that. These qualifiers are essential, because they show that rights are conditional, not absolute. When a choice contains strong words like always, never, absolutely, or unconditionally, it is essential to compare them carefully with the wording in the passage. If the passage clearly introduces limits, such extreme options are usually incorrect.

Final Answer:
The statement that is NOT implied by the passage is that laws guarantee religious and social rights absolutely and without any conditions.