Reducing knock in spark ignition (SI) engines Which measures help reduce knocking tendency in SI engines under otherwise similar conditions?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: both (a) and (b)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Knock in SI engines arises from auto-ignition of the end-gas ahead of the flame front. It depends on pressure, temperature, and time available for pre-flame reactions. Control strategies modify one or more of these factors to reduce end-gas auto-ignition propensity.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Conventional SI engine with throttled or modern load control.
  • Same fuel and compression ratio for the comparison.
  • Focus on operating settings (timing and speed) rather than design changes.


Concept / Approach:

Retarding spark timing shifts the pressure rise closer to or slightly after top dead center, lowering end-gas temperature and pressure before auto-ignition can occur. Increasing engine speed shortens the total time available for end-gas reactions, also reducing knock likelihood for the same load and timing. Hence both measures mitigate knock.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Knock intensity correlates with end-gas temperature, pressure, and residence time.Retard spark → reduces peak pre-TDC pressures → end-gas less prone to auto-ignite.Increase speed → reduces residence time → fewer pre-flame reactions.


Verification / Alternative check:

Dynamometer tests show reduced knock counts when spark is retarded and when operating at higher rpm with constant load, until other limits (e.g., cycle-by-cycle variability) appear.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Advancing timing at low speed can aggravate knock due to higher end-gas pressures and temperatures.


Common Pitfalls:

Over-retarding damages efficiency and increases exhaust temperatures; mitigation must balance performance and durability.


Final Answer:

both (a) and (b)

More Questions from IC Engines and Nuclear Power Plants

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion